Banned Books Week is coming up, and so I followed a link to the American Library Association's list of 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books of 1990-2000.
I'm not surprised to hear of people challenging Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women's Fantasies by Nancy Friday and The New Joy of Gay Sex by Charles Silverstein. However...
A Light in the Attic (#51)? And Where's Waldo (#88)?
Seriously, people.
I'm not surprised to hear of people challenging Women on Top: How Real Life Has Changed Women's Fantasies by Nancy Friday and The New Joy of Gay Sex by Charles Silverstein. However...
A Light in the Attic (#51)? And Where's Waldo (#88)?
Seriously, people.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-27 01:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-27 05:45 am (UTC)Honestly, I have a hard time imagining a book so terrible that you'd want it locked up somewhere away from people. Why not just explain to everyone you know that it's bad and rant about it on the internet? I have a sneaking suspicion it's ostensibly "to protect teh children!" But, um... well, in most cases, the children are probably fine. It's the parents who feel threatened.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-27 12:15 pm (UTC)A Wrinkle in Time
There are some great books on that list. (And A Wrinkle in Time is presumably too Unitarian for people, or something? Or it encourages rebellion against cardboard authoritarianism?)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-09-27 05:56 pm (UTC)It does read like a list of "Good books to check out."