Star Wars Commerce: 1977 vs. 1999
May. 31st, 2006 12:46 pmI started thinking more about this when I saw the Biggs footage again - I hadn't watched it since whenever I last had Behind the Magic loaded on my computer.
This quote is what got me started:
BIGGS: What good is all your uncle's work if it's taken over by the Empire? You know they're starting to nationalize commerce in the central systems...it won't be long before your uncle is merely a tenant, slaving for the greater glory of the Empire.
Compare this to The Phantom Menace, where the opening villains belong to something called the Trade Federation. (Such a friendly-sounding name. "Trade" makes me think of kids happily swapping Pokemon cards on the playground, or whatever they're into now, and "Federation" makes me think of a kind of club where various organizations/governments hang out and follow the agreed-upon clubhouse rules. I guess no one expects the TF Inquisition?) The TF guys are immoral, or at least amoral, cowards who sign up with a Sith lord and invade a planet and kill people to protest taxation. Now, George could have gone another route with that - I think I remember something about some colonists who protested taxes once, and they're usually the good guys in the kiddie stories at least - but anyway, killing innocent people (rather than, say, soldiers or corrupt politicians or something) is definitely a bad guy move. (Not that we actually see any of those innocent people die onscreen, mind you. There's hardly even any damage to the city. Strange, that.) The following two movies include new minor villains such as the Banking Clan and a ship called the Invisible Hand.
So, to summarize:
A New Hope, 1977: That ebil government, taking over corporations and small farmers! The people need to rebel and stop it!
The Phantom Menace, 1999: Those ebil corporations, taking over planets and small Gungan communities! The people need to get the government to stop them!
Yeah, a vast oversimplification. And not necessarily incompatible - stopping corporations from invading sovereign planets isn't a government takeover but just making them follow the same rules as everyone else, after all. And it's not like the government is totally fabulous in the Prequels - it has its own problems - or completely reviled in the Originals - the Empire's first big move in ANH is dissolving the Senate.
Still, I think it's interesting how GL's focus changed. He could have just focused on the "good government goes bad" aspect and had some sort of government agency invade Naboo rather than the Trade Federation, after all. (For their own good, naturally.) I don't know whether this was always the plan, to emphasize different kinds of power and ways it could be abused rather than sticking to a simpler dichotomy, or whether he got more interested in a compatible but slightly different track over the years, or whether he significantly changed his political philosophy. (Maybe even he isn't sure. It's hard to get inside your head that far in the past sometimes and remember what you were thinking.) So I don't know what to do with the observation, really, other than just note that this is one more way that the Prequels are different from the Originals.
This quote is what got me started:
BIGGS: What good is all your uncle's work if it's taken over by the Empire? You know they're starting to nationalize commerce in the central systems...it won't be long before your uncle is merely a tenant, slaving for the greater glory of the Empire.
Compare this to The Phantom Menace, where the opening villains belong to something called the Trade Federation. (Such a friendly-sounding name. "Trade" makes me think of kids happily swapping Pokemon cards on the playground, or whatever they're into now, and "Federation" makes me think of a kind of club where various organizations/governments hang out and follow the agreed-upon clubhouse rules. I guess no one expects the TF Inquisition?) The TF guys are immoral, or at least amoral, cowards who sign up with a Sith lord and invade a planet and kill people to protest taxation. Now, George could have gone another route with that - I think I remember something about some colonists who protested taxes once, and they're usually the good guys in the kiddie stories at least - but anyway, killing innocent people (rather than, say, soldiers or corrupt politicians or something) is definitely a bad guy move. (Not that we actually see any of those innocent people die onscreen, mind you. There's hardly even any damage to the city. Strange, that.) The following two movies include new minor villains such as the Banking Clan and a ship called the Invisible Hand.
So, to summarize:
A New Hope, 1977: That ebil government, taking over corporations and small farmers! The people need to rebel and stop it!
The Phantom Menace, 1999: Those ebil corporations, taking over planets and small Gungan communities! The people need to get the government to stop them!
Yeah, a vast oversimplification. And not necessarily incompatible - stopping corporations from invading sovereign planets isn't a government takeover but just making them follow the same rules as everyone else, after all. And it's not like the government is totally fabulous in the Prequels - it has its own problems - or completely reviled in the Originals - the Empire's first big move in ANH is dissolving the Senate.
Still, I think it's interesting how GL's focus changed. He could have just focused on the "good government goes bad" aspect and had some sort of government agency invade Naboo rather than the Trade Federation, after all. (For their own good, naturally.) I don't know whether this was always the plan, to emphasize different kinds of power and ways it could be abused rather than sticking to a simpler dichotomy, or whether he got more interested in a compatible but slightly different track over the years, or whether he significantly changed his political philosophy. (Maybe even he isn't sure. It's hard to get inside your head that far in the past sometimes and remember what you were thinking.) So I don't know what to do with the observation, really, other than just note that this is one more way that the Prequels are different from the Originals.